Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 15, 2019

Kannan v. Apple Inc.

Judge
Edward Davila
Docket
5:17-cv-07305
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kannan v. Apple Inc., Judge Demarchi granted Apple’s motion to seal an exhibit containing Kannan’s personal information from a discovery dispute.

Who this affects

Apple Inc. and Raja Kannan; the ruling concerns Exhibit C, which contains Kannan’s personal and employment-related information.

What happened

In Kannan v. Apple Inc., Apple asked to seal Exhibit C to a filing about its subpoenas to third parties for Raja Kannan’s employment applications. The parties had agreed to treat the exhibit as confidential, and Kannan did not respond to the sealing request.

The court said the dispute concerned discovery—not the underlying claims or defenses—so the lower “good cause” standard applied. Exhibit C included Kannan’s contact information, employment history, and information about whether he was offered employment.

The court found good cause to keep Exhibit C under seal and granted Apple’s administrative motion. The order was signed by Judge Virginia K. Demarchi.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kannan v. Apple Inc. · No. 5:17-cv-07305
Judge
Edward Davila
Date
Oct. 15, 2019

Background

Apple filed an administrative motion to seal Exhibit C to a joint letter brief concerning a discovery dispute. The dispute involved Apple’s subpoenas to third parties for Raja Kannan’s employment applications and Kannan’s request for a protective order concerning those subpoenas. The parties had agreed to treat Exhibit C as confidential under their protective order. Kannan did not file a response to the sealing motion.

Legal standard

The court explained that judicial records generally are presumed to be open to the public. A lower standard applies, however, when the material concerns a matter only tangentially related to the merits of the case. Because the underlying dispute concerned discovery rather than the parties’ claims or defenses, the court applied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)’s “good cause” standard.

Ruling

The court found good cause to seal Exhibit C because it contained materials designated confidential and included Kannan’s personal information, including contact information, employment history, and information about the decision whether to offer him employment. The court therefore granted Apple’s administrative motion to seal Exhibit C. The order was signed by Virginia K. Demarchi, United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.