Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 21, 2024

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.169.20.11

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:24-cv-04558
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
CopyrightDiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge DeMarchi granted Strike 3’s request to subpoena Comcast for the subscriber’s identity.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the identity and address of the John Doe subscriber from Comcast. Comcast must notify the subscriber and may object or seek a protective order. The order protects the subscriber’s identifying information from public disclosure absent consent or court permission.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued a John Doe subscriber assigned internet protocol address 67.169.20.11 and asked to subpoena Comcast before the parties’ required early case-management meeting. Strike 3 sought the subscriber’s true name and address so it could identify the defendant.

The court found good cause for early discovery. It found that Strike 3 had identified a potentially suable defendant, described steps it had taken to locate the defendant, presented an action that could withstand a motion to dismiss, and showed a reasonable likelihood that Comcast could identify the subscriber. The court also noted Strike 3’s claimed compliance with copyright-registration requirements.

Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granted the motion. Strike 3 may serve Comcast with a subpoena for the subscriber’s name and address, but Comcast must notify the subscriber, may object or seek a protective order, and any identifying information produced may be used only to protect and enforce Strike 3’s rights and may not be publicly disclosed without the subscriber’s consent or court permission.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.169.20.11 · No. 5:24-cv-04558
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Aug. 21, 2024

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve Comcast Cable, the internet service provider associated with IP address 67.169.20.11, with a third-party subpoena before the parties held the conference normally required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena sought the true name and address of the subscriber to whom Comcast assigned that IP address.

Court’s analysis

The court found good cause for allowing the early discovery. It determined that Strike 3 had identified the Doe defendant with enough specificity for the court to determine that the defendant was a real person or entity who could be sued in federal court; identified earlier steps taken to locate the defendant; shown that its action could withstand a motion to dismiss; and shown a reasonable likelihood that discovery could identify the defendant so that service of process would be possible. The court also noted that Strike 3’s application indicated compliance with the copyright-registration requirements in 17 U.S.C. § 411(a).

The court cited authority stating that a bare allegation that an internet subscriber was registered to an IP address associated with infringing activity is not enough, by itself, to state a plausible claim for direct or contributory copyright infringement. But, based on the record at this stage, the court concluded that Strike 3 could obtain limited discovery to determine the defendant’s identity. The order did not decide whether the subscriber infringed copyright or was liable to Strike 3.

Order

Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granted Strike 3’s application. Strike 3 may serve a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 subpoena on Comcast requiring Comcast to provide the subscriber’s true name and address, and Strike 3 must attach the order to the subpoena.

Comcast must serve the subscriber with a copy of the subpoena and the order within 30 days after the subpoena is served on Comcast. Comcast may use any reasonable method, including first-class mail or overnight service to the subscriber’s last known address. Strike 3 may use information produced in response to the subpoena only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint. Comcast may object to the subpoena or seek a protective order. If Comcast provides identifying information, Strike 3 may not publicly disclose it without the subscriber’s consent or permission from the court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.