Build Group, Inc v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
- Vince Chhabria
- 3:24-cv-02726
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Build Group v. Indian Harbor, Judge Chhabria stayed the case because arbitration rules assigned arbitrability to the arbitrator and Build Group did not challenge that delegation.
Build Group, Inc. and Indian Harbor Insurance Company; the case is stayed while the related motion to compel arbitration proceeds.
What happened
Build Group, Inc. sued Indian Harbor Insurance Company, and Indian Harbor asked the court to dismiss or stay the case. The parties’ arbitration agreement incorporated rules assigning questions about whether the dispute could be arbitrated to an arbitrator.
Build Group argued that the entire arbitration agreement was unfair under California law. The court did not decide that argument because Build Group had not specifically challenged the delegation provision or argued that the court, rather than the arbitrator, should decide arbitrability.
Judge Vince Chhabria granted Indian Harbor’s motion to dismiss or stay and stayed the case while Indian Harbor’s motion to compel arbitration proceeded in the Southern District of New York. The parties must file status reports after that motion, and possibly after the arbitrator decides whether the dispute is subject to arbitration.
The detailed version
- Build Group, Inc v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company · No. 3:24-cv-02726
- Vince Chhabria
- Aug. 28, 2024
Background
Indian Harbor moved to dismiss or stay Build Group’s case. The parties had an arbitration agreement incorporating the American Arbitration Association’s Commercial Arbitration Rules. Those rules delegated the question of arbitrability—whether the dispute must be arbitrated—to the arbitrator.
Build Group argued that the entire arbitration agreement was unconscionable under California law. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute between the parties.
Court’s reasoning
The court held that it could not consider Build Group’s unconscionability arguments because Build Group did not specifically refer to the delegation provision or make arguments about who should decide arbitrability. The court relied on Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent requiring a party opposing arbitration to separately challenge the delegation provision, even when the challenge is the same as the challenge to the arbitration agreement as a whole.
Ruling and next steps
The court granted Indian Harbor’s motion to dismiss or stay and stayed the case pending resolution of Indian Harbor’s motion to compel arbitration in the Southern District of New York. The parties must file a status report 14 days after that motion is decided. If the case is sent to arbitration to decide arbitrability, they must file another status report 14 days after the arbitrator decides whether the case is subject to arbitration. The order did not decide whether the dispute is arbitrable or whether the arbitration agreement is unconscionable.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.