Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 20, 2024

Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.213.157.117

Full caption

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.213.157.117

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:24-cv-06096
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Demarchi allowed Strike 3 to subpoena AT&T for the subscriber’s identity.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the identity and address of the John Doe subscriber from AT&T Internet. AT&T Internet must notify the subscriber and may object or seek a protective order. The subscriber’s identifying information is restricted from public disclosure absent consent or court permission.

What happened

In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.213.157.117, Strike 3 sought permission to subpoena AT&T Internet before the parties’ required early case-management conference. Strike 3 said the internet address was associated with copyright infringement and that AT&T could identify the subscriber.

The court found good cause for early discovery. It determined that Strike 3 had identified a potentially suable person or entity, described efforts to locate the defendant, presented a claim that could withstand a motion to dismiss, and showed a reasonable likelihood that discovery would identify the defendant. The court also noted that Strike 3 had satisfied copyright-registration requirements.

Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granted Strike 3’s request. Strike 3 may serve AT&T Internet with a subpoena seeking the subscriber’s true name and address, subject to notice, objections, and possible protective-order proceedings. Strike 3 may use the information only to protect and enforce its rights in the complaint and may not publicly disclose it without the subscriber’s consent or court permission.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.213.157.117 · No. 5:24-cv-06096
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Sept. 20, 2024

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on AT&T, Inc., identified in the order as “AT&T Internet,” before the parties held the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena seeks the true name and address of the subscriber to whom AT&T Internet assigned IP address 107.213.157.117.

Court’s analysis

The court found good cause for early discovery. It determined that Strike 3 had shown that:

- it could identify a real person or entity who could be sued in federal court; - it had described steps already taken to locate the defendant; - its copyright-infringement action could withstand a motion to dismiss; and - there was a reasonable likelihood that discovery would identify the defendant and make service of process possible.

The court also noted that Strike 3’s application indicated that it had met the copyright-registration requirements under 17 U.S.C. § 411(a). The order stated that, once the defendant’s identity is learned, the internet address associated with the alleged infringing activity could support a plausible claim for direct or contributory copyright infringement. At this stage, the court allowed discovery to determine the defendant’s identity; it did not decide whether copyright infringement occurred or whether the subscriber was liable.

Order

The court granted Strike 3’s application. Strike 3 may serve a subpoena under Rule 45 on AT&T Internet requiring it to provide the subscriber’s true name and address, and Strike 3 must attach a copy of the order to the subpoena.

AT&T Internet must serve the subscriber with copies of the subpoena and order within 30 days after the subpoena is served on AT&T Internet. AT&T Internet may object to the subpoena and may seek a protective order, which is a court order limiting or regulating discovery.

Strike 3 may use information disclosed in response to the subpoena only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint. If AT&T Internet provides the subscriber’s identity, Strike 3 may not publicly disclose that information without the subscriber’s consent or permission from the court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.