Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 7, 2024

Hill v. Lee Ana

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:24-cv-07162
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hill v. Lee Ana, Magistrate Judge Peterson transferred the civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because the claim arose there.

Who this affects

Cymeyon Hill and the defendants are affected because the case was transferred from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California; the order did not resolve the underlying claims.

What happened

In Cymeyon Hill v. Lee Ana, Cymeyon Hill, a civil detainee representing himself, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under a federal law allowing claims against state officials. The opinion states that the claim arose in Napa County, which is in the Northern District of California.

The court explained that federal law permits a case filed in the wrong district to be transferred to the proper district when doing so serves justice. It concluded that the case should have been filed in the Northern District of California.

Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson ordered the matter transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order transferred the case rather than deciding the underlying civil-rights claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hill v. Lee Ana · No. 4:24-cv-07162
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
Oct. 7, 2024

Background

Cymeyon Hill, described as a civil detainee proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The opinion states that the claim arose in Napa County, California.

Venue analysis

The court recited the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute identifies districts where a civil action may be brought, including a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. Because the claim arose in Napa County, the court concluded that the proper venue was the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Disposition

The court relied on 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), which permits a federal court to transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district in the interest of justice. Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson ordered that the matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order did not decide the merits of Hill's civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.