Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled July 10, 2024

King v. Belinger

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:24-cv-01303
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In King v. Bellinger, Judge Tostrud dismissed the action without prejudice because King did not pay the initial filing fee, and denied two motions as moot.

Who this affects

Arron King, Sr.; Officer Bellinger, Correctional Officer – Staff; MD.O.C.; and Keith Ellingston, Secretary of State.

What happened

In King v. Bellinger, Arron King, Sr. was ordered to pay an initial filing fee of $68.40. The opinion states that King was incarcerated and representing himself. He did not pay the fee.

Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung recommended dismissing the action for failure to prosecute, meaning failure to move the case forward. No party objected, and the recommendation was reviewed for clear error. The Clerk also sent King copies of the orders explaining his payment responsibility, but he still did not pay or respond.

Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court denied King’s motion to appoint counsel and his application to proceed without paying the filing fee as moot.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
King v. Belinger · No. 0:24-cv-01303
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
July 10, 2024

Background

Arron King, Sr. filed this action against Officer Bellinger, Correctional Officer – Staff; MD.O.C.; and Keith Ellingston, Secretary of State. The opinion states that King was incarcerated and proceeding without a lawyer. In April, Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung ordered King to pay an initial filing fee of $68.40.

King did not pay the fee. He later sent a June 24, 2024 letter asking whether payment was required in this case. The Clerk of Court responded the same day and sent him copies of Judge Leung’s order and the Report and Recommendation, both of which explained his payment responsibility. More than two weeks later, King had not paid the fee or responded to the Report and Recommendation.

Court’s analysis

Judge Leung recommended dismissing the action for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Failure to prosecute means failing to move the case forward. No party objected to the Report and Recommendation. Because there was no objection, Judge Tostrud reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake. He found no clear error.

Disposition

The court accepted the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court also denied as moot King’s Motion to Appoint Counsel and Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, which sought permission to proceed without paying the usual filing fee.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.