Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:21-cv-02530
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Goldmann v. County of Sherburne, Judge Menendez accepted the recommendation and dismissed the class-action claims without prejudice.
The class-action claims in Steven Goldmann et al.’s amended complaint; the order does not state that it dismissed the entire case or non-class claims.
What happened
In Goldmann v. County of Sherburne, the court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation concerning the class-action claims in the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. No party filed objections within the allowed time.
Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. The court found no error and accepted the recommendation.
Judge Katherine M. Menendez ordered that the class-action claims be dismissed without prejudice and removed from the amended complaint. The order also struck references describing the case as a class action, including specified paragraphs and portions of the caption.
The detailed version
- Goldmann v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department · No. 0:21-cv-02530
- Katherine Menendez
- July 15, 2024
Background
The order concerns a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Dulce Foster on May 31, 2024. The recommendation addressed the class-action claims in the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The opinion does not describe the underlying allegations or explain the recommendation’s reasoning in detail.
Review of the Recommendation
No objections were filed within the permitted time. Under the court’s stated procedure, the absence of specific objections meant that the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a fresh review of disputed portions. The court stated that it had carefully reviewed the recommendation and the record and found no error, clear or otherwise.
Ruling
Judge Katherine M. Menendez accepted the Report and Recommendation. The court dismissed the class-action claims without prejudice and struck them from the amended complaint. The order specifically identified paragraphs 33, 48 through 60, and 137(A), as well as the references to this case as a class action in the caption and paragraphs 1 and 2. The order did not state that the entire case or any non-class claims were dismissed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.
Related cases
- Triple S Farms, LLC; Green Acres Dairy, LLC; Charles Fry and Emily Snyder…Aug 2026
- Triple S Farms, LLC; Green Acres Dairy, LLC; Charles Fry and Emily Snyder…Aug 2026
- Triple S Farms LLC, Green Acres Dairy, LLC, Charles Fry and Emily Snyder, Rocky…Jul 2026
- MekhailOct 2025
- Gressv. Allianz Life
- Triple Sv. DeLaval Inc