Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Substantive rulingFiled July 29, 2024

Perkins v. City of Minneapolis

Judge
Eric Tostrud
Docket
0:23-cv-03810
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In Perkins v. City of Minneapolis, Judge Tostrud denied Perkins’s premature summary-judgment motion without prejudice after accepting an unobjected-to recommendation.

Who this affects

Byron L. Perkins’s motion for summary judgment was denied without prejudice; the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis City Attorney Office were defendants in the case.

What happened

In Perkins v. City of Minneapolis, Byron L. Perkins asked the court to grant summary judgment. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the arguments supporting his motion.

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on June 12, 2024. Because no party objected, the court reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Eric C. Tostrud accepted the Report and Recommendation and denied Perkins’s motion for summary judgment without prejudice because it was premature.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perkins v. City of Minneapolis · No. 0:23-cv-03810
Judge
Eric Tostrud
Date
July 29, 2024

Background

Byron L. Perkins sued the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis City Attorney Office. Perkins filed a motion for summary judgment. The opinion does not provide the factual background of the lawsuit or explain why Perkins sought summary judgment.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a Report and Recommendation on June 12, 2024. No party objected. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the district court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s analysis. The court found no clear error.

Ruling

Judge Eric C. Tostrud ordered that the Report and Recommendation be accepted. The court denied Byron L. Perkins’s motion for summary judgment without prejudice as premature. The opinion does not further explain the reason the motion was premature or address the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.