Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst
- Katherine Menendez
- 0:24-cv-01718
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst, Judge Menendez dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute after accepting an unobjected-to recommendation.
The action brought by Enahi Beiza-Denova against Thomas Hollenhorst was dismissed without prejudice.
What happened
Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst came before the court on a magistrate judge’s recommendation. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or explain the alleged failure to prosecute.
No objections were filed to the recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error and found no error.
Judge Katherine M. Menendez accepted the recommendation in full and dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The court ordered judgment to be entered.
The detailed version
- Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst · No. 0:24-cv-01718
- Katherine Menendez
- Aug. 21, 2024
Background
The opinion provides no details about the claims or the events underlying the action. It addresses a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on June 27, 2024.
Court’s Review
No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation within the permitted period. Because there were no objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a fresh review of disputed issues. The court found no error, clear or otherwise, and accepted the recommendation in full.
Disposition
Judge Katherine M. Menendez ordered that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and directed that judgment be entered accordingly. The opinion does not provide additional facts explaining the failure to prosecute.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.