Thakrar v. StockX, LLC
- Jeffrey Bryan
- 0:24-cv-01901
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 2
In Thakrar v. StockX, Judge Bryan dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Thakrar failed to pay the filing fee or seek a fee waiver.
Poojan Thakrar’s complaint against StockX, LLC was dismissed without prejudice because he did not timely pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed without paying it.
What happened
In Thakrar v. StockX, LLC, self-represented plaintiff Poojan Thakrar sued StockX, LLC.
The court reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss the complaint because Thakrar did not timely pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying it. Neither party objected to the recommendation.
Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed Thakrar’s complaint without prejudice. The court ordered that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Thakrar v. StockX, LLC · No. 0:24-cv-01901
- Jeffrey M. Bryan
- July 24, 2024
Background
Self-represented plaintiff Poojan Thakrar filed a complaint against StockX, LLC. The court had previously ordered Thakrar to timely pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed without paying the fee. Thakrar did neither by the required deadline.
Recommendation and review
United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster recommended dismissing the complaint for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Neither party objected to the report and recommendation, and the objection deadline had passed. Because there were no timely objections, the district court reviewed the recommendation for clear error.
Ruling
The court found no clear error in the recommendation. Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan adopted the report and recommendation and dismissed Thakrar’s complaint without prejudice. The court also ordered that judgment be entered.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.