Weber v. GIMH Holdings, LLC
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:19-cv-07559
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Weber v. GIMH Holdings, LLC, Judge Abrams ordered the parties to discuss consenting to a magistrate judge handling the case.
The parties in Weber v. GIMH Holdings, LLC, including Andrew T. Weber and GIMH Holdings, LLC, et al.; the order required them to discuss and report whether they consented to proceedings before Magistrate Judge Moses.
What happened
In Weber v. GIMH Holdings, LLC, the court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily consent to have Magistrate Judge Moses conduct all further proceedings.
The parties had two weeks to submit a signed consent form if they both agreed. If any party did not agree, they had to file a joint letter saying so without identifying who withheld consent. The order states that withholding consent would have no adverse consequences.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also reminded the parties that the court usually must approve settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Weber v. GIMH Holdings, LLC · No. 1:19-cv-07559
- Ronnie Abrams
- Jan. 15, 2020
Background
The order was issued to conserve resources, promote efficiency, and seek a faster disposition of the case. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims in detail, although it reminds the parties that court approval is generally required for settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Consent to Magistrate Judge
The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Magistrate Judge Moses conduct all further proceedings. If both parties consented, they had to submit a fully signed consent and reference form within two weeks of the order. The referral would take effect only if the court approved the form.
With the parties’ consent, Magistrate Judge Moses could conduct all further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment. An appeal would go directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. If any party did not consent, the parties had to file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they did not consent without identifying the party or parties who withheld consent. The order expressly states that withholding consent would not result in adverse consequences.
Disposition
This was a procedural order concerning possible consent to proceed before a magistrate judge. Judge Ronnie Abrams did not rule on the merits of the underlying dispute or grant or deny a motion resolving any claim.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.