Trireme Energy Holdings, Inc. v. Innogy Renewables US LLC
- Rochon
- 1:20-cv-05015
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 144
In Trireme Energy Holdings v. Innogy Renewables, Judge Rochon issued an order appending bench-trial exhibits without stating a ruling.
The parties’ trial record is affected because the listed bench-trial exhibits were appended to the order. The provided text does not state any merits ruling or final case disposition affecting the parties’ claims.
What happened
Trireme Energy Holdings, Inc. v. Innogy Renewables US LLC concerns a bench trial involving the parties’ merger agreement and the Cassadaga wind project, as reflected in the attached trial materials. The provided text does not include the court’s factual findings or decision on the parties’ dispute.
The order states that court exhibits were appended. It identifies opening slides, deposition designations played in court, a list of admitted exhibits, and excerpts of designated deposition testimony. It does not state that any motion was granted or denied, enter judgment, or announce any other case disposition.
Judge Jennifer L. Rochon signed the order on November 29, 2023. Based on the provided text, the court’s action was limited to appending the exhibits, and no ruling on the underlying dispute is stated.
The detailed version
- Trireme Energy Holdings, Inc. v. Innogy Renewables US LLC · No. 1:20-cv-05015
- Rochon
- Nov. 29, 2023
Nature of the Order
The provided opinion is an order stating that the court exhibits from a bench trial are appended. A bench trial is a trial decided by a judge rather than a jury. The text does not contain the court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment, or ruling on the parties’ underlying dispute.
Materials Appended
The order identifies six categories of appended exhibits:
- Plaintiffs’ opening slides; - Defendants’ opening slides; - Deposition designations for Andrew Young played in court; - Deposition designations for Jeffrey Puterbaugh played in court; - A list of exhibits admitted with deposition designations; and - Designated deposition-testimony excerpts played in court.
The appended materials concern the parties’ merger agreement, payment milestones, and the development and construction of the Cassadaga wind project. They include competing presentations and evidence about whether the project could achieve commercial operation by the end of 2020 and whether the defendants’ conduct affected a potential milestone payment. Those materials include party positions and evidence, not findings by the court in the provided text.
Ruling and Disposition
The order does not grant or deny a motion, resolve a claim, enter judgment, or state any other disposition. It simply appends the identified trial exhibits and concludes with the court’s signature.
Read the full 144-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.