Integral Contracting Inc. v. Allied World Assurance Company, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-08857
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Integral Contracting v. Allied World, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, without costs and without prejudice to timely restoration.
Integral Contracting Inc., Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc., and Axis Insurance Company; the action was discontinued, subject to possible restoration by July 1, 2024 if the settlement could not be put in writing.
What happened
Integral Contracting Inc. sued Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc. and Axis Insurance Company in the Southern District of New York. The court was told that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. It also allowed the case to be restored to the court’s calendar if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, provided an application to restore the action was made by July 1, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order on May 30, 2024. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
The detailed version
- Integral Contracting Inc. v. Allied World Assurance Company, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-08857
- Vyskocil
- May 30, 2024
Background
Integral Contracting Inc. brought this action against Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.), Inc. and Axis Insurance Company. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or describe the parties’ settlement terms.
Settlement and Disposition
The court stated that Magistrate Judge Cave had advised it that the parties reached a settlement in principle. The court therefore ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. The court required any application to restore the action to be made by July 1, 2024.
Result
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on May 30, 2024. The order disposed of the action based on the reported settlement in principle and did not decide the underlying legal claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.