Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2024

Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and…

Full caption

Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund and District Council No. 9 International Union of Paint v. J & S Installation LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:24-cv-04145
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

Trustees v. J & S Installation LLC: Judge Rochon set deadlines for briefing and service in an arbitration-confirmation proceeding.

Who this affects

The petitioners must meet the filing and service deadlines, and J & S Installation LLC may oppose the petition by the stated deadline.

What happened

In Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and others v. J & S Installation LLC, the petitioners asked the court to confirm an arbitration award. They had not yet filed proof that they served the complaint.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional supporting materials by June 14, 2024. J & S Installation LLC may oppose the petition by July 8, and the petitioners may reply by July 15.

Judge Rochon also ordered the petitioners to serve the order and file proof of that service by June 15, and to promptly file proof that they served the complaint. This order set deadlines; it did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees of the District Council No.9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund and… · No. 1:24-cv-04145
Judge
Rochon
Date
May 31, 2024

Background

The petitioners filed a complaint seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. The opinion states that they had not yet docketed an affidavit of service, meaning a sworn filing showing that the complaint had been served on the respondent. The court noted that proceedings to confirm arbitration awards are treated similarly to motions for summary judgment.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting their petition by June 14, 2024. The respondent’s opposition, if any, was due July 8, 2024, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due July 15, 2024.

The court separately ordered the petitioners to serve a copy of the order on the respondent and file an affidavit of service by June 15, 2024. It also ordered them to file their affidavit of service of the complaint promptly.

Effect of the Order

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued a scheduling and service order. The opinion does not state that the court confirmed or rejected the arbitration award, and it does not otherwise decide the petition’s merits.

Uncertainty

The judge is identified as “Jennifer L. Rochon” in the body of the opinion, but the signature block appears in the provided text as “Ase L. ROCHON.”

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.