Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 3, 2024

Montes v. Miller

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:24-cv-04141
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Montes v. Miller, Judge Swain ordered a prisoner to pay filing fees or submit forms to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Germaine Montes, an incarcerated person representing himself, must either pay the required fees or submit the forms needed to request permission to proceed without prepayment; the case may be dismissed if he does not comply within 30 days.

What happened

In Montes v. Miller, Germaine Montes filed a civil case without paying the required fees or submitting a completed application to proceed without prepayment and a prisoner authorization. The opinion says Montes is incarcerated and representing himself.

The court gave Montes 30 days to either pay $405 or submit the required forms. If he submits the forms, the $350 filing fee will generally be collected in installments from his prison account, while the $55 administrative fee does not apply to people allowed to proceed without prepayment.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that no summons issue yet and said the case would be processed if Montes complied. If he did not comply within the deadline, the action would be dismissed; the court also denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Montes v. Miller · No. 7:24-cv-04141
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
June 3, 2024

Background

Germaine Montes filed this civil action against Mark Miller, identified in the caption as a superintendent, and other defendants. The opinion states that Montes is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility and is representing himself. He filed the complaint without paying the filing fees and without submitting a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees or a prisoner authorization.

Court’s order

The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $405 in fees—a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee—or request permission to proceed without prepaying fees by submitting a signed application and a prisoner authorization. If permission is granted, the $350 filing fee must be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to provide certified account statements for the previous six months and to make the required deductions.

The court ordered Montes, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $405 or submit the application and prisoner authorization. The documents must identify docket number 24-CV-4141 (LTS). The court directed that no summons issue at that time. It stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Montes complied and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the allowed period.

Appeal and classification

The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. This is a procedural order because it addresses filing fees and authorization to proceed, not the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.