Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 4, 2024

Saliba v. Hanover Capital Group LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-00401
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Saliba v. Hanover Capital Group LLC, Judge Vyskocil ordered plaintiffs to file any planned default-judgment motion against Hanover Capital by June 14.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and Hanover Capital Group LLC; the order set a deadline for the plaintiffs to seek default judgment against the company.

What happened

In Saliba v. Hanover Capital Group LLC, the plaintiffs sued Hanover Capital Group LLC and two individuals. Hanover Capital was served with the complaint, but it did not file a response by the deadline.

Haim Llalouz asked to represent Hanover Capital, but the court denied that request because a company must be represented by a licensed lawyer. The court ordered Hanover Capital to obtain counsel, but no lawyer appeared. The plaintiffs obtained a clerk’s certificate of default but had not yet asked for a default judgment.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the plaintiffs to file any anticipated motion for default judgment against Hanover Capital by June 14, 2024, following the court’s civil-case rules.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Saliba v. Hanover Capital Group LLC · No. 1:24-cv-00401
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 4, 2024

Background

Layla Saliba, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed this action against Hanover Capital Group LLC, Haim Llalouz, and Yanathon Llalouz. The complaint was filed on January 18, 2024. Hanover Capital was served with the summons and complaint, and its response was due February 26, 2024. It did not file a response.

Representation and Default

On March 4, 2024, Haim Llalouz asked to represent Hanover Capital. The court denied that request because a corporate defendant must appear through a licensed attorney. The court ordered licensed counsel for Hanover Capital to file a notice of appearance by April 30, 2024, and explained that the plaintiffs could then seek a default judgment if counsel did not appear. No licensed counsel appeared for Hanover Capital. The plaintiffs obtained a clerk’s certificate of default against the company but had not filed a motion for default judgment.

Order

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the plaintiffs to file any anticipated motion for default judgment against Hanover Capital by June 14, 2024, in accordance with the court’s Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. The order did not itself enter a default judgment.

Practical Effect

The order set a deadline for the plaintiffs to pursue default judgment against Hanover Capital. The opinion did not decide the amount or terms of any default judgment, and it did not resolve the claims against the individual defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.