Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp.
- Andrew Carter
- 1:19-cv-11168
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp., Judge Aaron approved a proposed notice for potential workers in a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action.
The parties and potential members of the Fair Labor Standards Act collective action, including workers who may receive the approved notice.
What happened
In Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp., the parties were required to submit a proposed notice for the court to review before it was sent to members of the potential collective action.
The parties agreed on the proposed notice except for whether it should list all defendants. The court had already allowed all defendants’ names to appear in the notice.
The court approved the proposed notice in substantially the same form submitted by the parties. Stewart D. Aaron, the United States Magistrate Judge who signed the order, issued the decision on June 4, 2024.
The detailed version
- Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-11168
- Andrew Carter
- June 4, 2024
Background
The parties were required to submit a proposed notice for the court’s review and approval. The notice concerned the pending Fair Labor Standards Act collective action and was intended for potential members of the collective—workers who might choose to join the case.
The parties stipulated to the proposed notice except for one issue: whether the notice should include the names of all defendants. In an earlier order, the court permitted all defendants’ names to appear in the proposed notice.
Ruling
The court approved the proposed notice in substantially the same form submitted for review. The order addressed the notice and did not decide the underlying claims.
Classification
This is a procedural order because it approved notice for a potential collective action without resolving the parties’ underlying legal claims. Judge Stewart D. Aaron, United States Magistrate Judge, signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.