Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 4, 2024

Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp.

Judge
Andrew Carter
Docket
1:19-cv-11168
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
FlsaEmploymentCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp., Judge Aaron approved a proposed notice for potential workers in a Fair Labor Standards Act collective action.

Who this affects

The parties and potential members of the Fair Labor Standards Act collective action, including workers who may receive the approved notice.

What happened

In Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp., the parties were required to submit a proposed notice for the court to review before it was sent to members of the potential collective action.

The parties agreed on the proposed notice except for whether it should list all defendants. The court had already allowed all defendants’ names to appear in the notice.

The court approved the proposed notice in substantially the same form submitted by the parties. Stewart D. Aaron, the United States Magistrate Judge who signed the order, issued the decision on June 4, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sarikaputar v. Veratip Corp. · No. 1:19-cv-11168
Judge
Andrew Carter
Date
June 4, 2024

Background

The parties were required to submit a proposed notice for the court’s review and approval. The notice concerned the pending Fair Labor Standards Act collective action and was intended for potential members of the collective—workers who might choose to join the case.

The parties stipulated to the proposed notice except for one issue: whether the notice should include the names of all defendants. In an earlier order, the court permitted all defendants’ names to appear in the proposed notice.

Ruling

The court approved the proposed notice in substantially the same form submitted for review. The order addressed the notice and did not decide the underlying claims.

Classification

This is a procedural order because it approved notice for a potential collective action without resolving the parties’ underlying legal claims. Judge Stewart D. Aaron, United States Magistrate Judge, signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.