Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 5, 2024

Karim v. Americana Art Enterprises, LLC

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-02452
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

Karim v. Americana Art Enterprises, LLC: Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 5, 2024.

Who this affects

Jessica Karim and the other similarly situated people she sought to represent, as well as Americana Art Enterprises, LLC; the action was discontinued based on a settlement in principle, subject to the stated restoration deadline.

What happened

In Karim v. Americana Art Enterprises, LLC, Jessica Karim told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the action had to be made by July 5, 2024.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no restoration request was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Karim v. Americana Art Enterprises, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-02452
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 5, 2024

Background

Jessica Karim brought the action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. Karim filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that any application to restore the action was made by July 5, 2024.

The court further ordered that if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal of the action would be with prejudice. The opinion does not state whether the settlement was ultimately completed or approved.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.