Holliday v. Artist
- Philip Halpern
- 7:23-cv-02410
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Holliday v. Artist, Judge Halpern granted C.O. Artist’s motion to dismiss Dorian Holliday’s time-barred claim with prejudice and closed the case.
Dorian Holliday’s claim against C.O. Artist was dismissed with prejudice; the case was closed, and fee-free appeal status was denied.
What happened
In Holliday v. Artist, the court granted Defendant C.O. Artist’s motion to dismiss Dorian Holliday’s claim. The judgment states that the claim was barred by the applicable filing deadline.
The court dismissed the claim with prejudice because changing the complaint would be futile. It also denied permission to proceed without paying fees on appeal and closed the case.
Judge Halpern issued the ruling referred to in the judgment dated June 7, 2024. The judgment was entered by the court clerk.
The detailed version
- Holliday v. Artist · No. 7:23-cv-02410
- Philip Halpern
- June 7, 2024
Ruling
The court granted Defendant C.O. Artist’s motion to dismiss. It stated that Dorian Holliday’s claim was time-barred, meaning it was filed after the applicable statute of limitations had expired. Because amendment would be futile, the claim was dismissed with prejudice.
Appeal and Case Status
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Holliday permission to proceed without paying the required fees for an appeal. The case was closed.
Scope of the Provided Text
The provided document is a judgment that refers to a separate Opinion and Order dated June 7, 2024. It does not explain the underlying claim or the court’s complete statute-of-limitations analysis.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.