Rivera v. Better Holdco, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-10635
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Rivera v. Better Holdco, Inc., Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 8, 2024.
Daniel Rivera and Better Holdco, Inc.; the action was discontinued after the reported settlement in principle.
What happened
In Rivera v. Better Holdco, Inc., the court received a letter from Daniel Rivera stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by July 8, 2024; otherwise, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on June 6, 2024. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or address the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Rivera v. Better Holdco, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-10635
- Vyskocil
- June 6, 2024
Background
The court received a letter from the plaintiff stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The discontinuance was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by July 8, 2024.
The order further stated that if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The court did not decide the merits of the underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.