Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 12, 2024

Pettigrew v. Radius Global Solutions LLC

Judge
Sidney Stein
Docket
1:24-cv-04013
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Pettigrew v. Radius Global Solutions LLC, Judge Stein ordered service by Marshals after allowing Pettigrew to proceed without fees.

Who this affects

Isaac Pettigrew, who is representing himself, and Radius Global Solutions LLC are affected. The order also directs the Clerk of Court and the United States Marshals Service to handle service of process.

What happened

Isaac Pettigrew sued Radius Global Solutions LLC under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, alleging that Radius accessed his TransUnion consumer report without a permissible purpose. Pettigrew is representing himself and seeks declaratory relief and damages.

The court had allowed Pettigrew to proceed without paying court fees. Because of that permission, the court said the Clerk and United States Marshals Service would assist with serving Radius. The court also extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Gary Stein ordered the Clerk to mail Pettigrew an information package, issue a summons, complete a service form for Radius, and provide the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Pettigrew’s Fair Credit Reporting Act allegations were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pettigrew v. Radius Global Solutions LLC · No. 1:24-cv-04013
Judge
Sidney Stein
Date
June 12, 2024

Background

Isaac Pettigrew, who is proceeding without a lawyer, brought this action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, a federal law governing consumer reports. He alleges that Radius Global Solutions LLC accessed his consumer report from TransUnion without a legally permitted purpose. He seeks a declaration and damages. The opinion states that the court had previously allowed Pettigrew to proceed without prepaying court fees.

Service of process

Because Pettigrew was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court explained that he was entitled to assistance from the court and the United States Marshals Service in serving Radius. The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue a summons for Radius, complete a United States Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Radius’s service address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the defendant.

The court stated that service must occur within 90 days after the summons is issued. It also stated that Pettigrew should request more time if service is not completed within that period. Pettigrew must notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.

Ruling

Judge Gary Stein ordered the Clerk to mail Pettigrew an information package and to arrange for service of the summons and complaint through the United States Marshals Service. The order concerns the mechanics of starting the case and does not decide the merits of Pettigrew’s Fair Credit Reporting Act claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.