Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2024

Taylor v. Trigeno

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:16-cv-01143
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Taylor v. City of New York, Judge Woods conditionally discontinued the settled case without prejudice and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Roy Joaquin Taylor and the defendants, including the City of New York, were affected. The settled action was conditionally discontinued, subject to possible restoration within 30 days, and the court directed that the case be closed.

What happened

In Roy Joaquin Taylor v. City of New York, et al., the court said the case had settled after a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.

The court conditionally discontinued the action without prejudice and without costs. Within 30 days, the parties could file their settlement and dismissal agreement, or Taylor could ask to restore the case if the settlement was not completed.

Judge Woods ordered the case closed and terminated pending motions. The order would become a final discontinuance with prejudice if Taylor did not request restoration within 30 days, and the court denied fee-free appeal status after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Taylor v. Trigeno · No. 1:16-cv-01143
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
June 13, 2024

Background

On March 25, 2024, the court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang for settlement purposes. After a settlement conference on June 4, 2024, the court was informed that the case had settled.

Order

The court ordered that the action be conditionally discontinued without prejudice and without costs. Within 30 days of the order, the parties could submit their own settlement and dismissal agreement. Alternatively, within that period, Taylor could apply by letter to restore the action to the court’s active calendar if the settlement was not completed. If Taylor requested restoration, the court would promptly return the case to the active docket and schedule further proceedings as appropriate.

The court stated that the order would be treated as a final discontinuance with prejudice if Taylor did not request restoration within the 30-day period. The court also explained that it would not retain jurisdiction to enforce a confidential settlement agreement unless the settlement terms were placed on the public record.

Appeal and case closure

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Taylor’s status allowing an appeal without prepaying fees. Judge Gregory H. Woods directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all pending motions, adjourn remaining dates, close the case, and mail Taylor a copy of the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.