Edmar Financial Company, LLC v. Currenex, Inc.
- Lewis Kaplan
- 1:21-cv-06598
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Edmar Financial v. Currenex, Stephen A. Fraser asked Judge Kaplan to seal GTS’s commercially sensitive materials; the provided text shows no ruling.
Non-party Global Trading Systems and the parties or public seeking access to the materials GTS asked to seal.
What happened
In Edmar Financial Company, LLC v. Currenex, Inc., non-party Global Trading Systems asked to seal parts of its opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion to compel.
GTS said the material came from a private asset purchase agreement involving HC Technologies, LLC and a GTS affiliate. It stated that the plaintiffs and HC Technologies did not object to the request.
The provided text does not show a ruling by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. It is a letter motion requesting that the materials remain sealed.
The detailed version
- Edmar Financial Company, LLC v. Currenex, Inc. · No. 1:21-cv-06598
- Lewis Kaplan
- June 12, 2024
Nature of the filing
The provided document is a letter motion, not a court opinion or order. Non-party Global Trading Systems (GTS) asked the court to seal highlighted portions of its opposition to the plaintiffs’ May 23, 2024 letter motion to compel.
Requested sealing
GTS stated that the redacted information concerned commercially sensitive transaction matters derived from a non-public asset purchase agreement between Defendant HC Technologies, LLC and a GTS affiliate. GTS also sought to seal the asset purchase agreement, identified as Exhibit 3 to its opposition.
GTS argued that there was good cause to keep the information under seal and that the information was unrelated to the plaintiffs’ claims. The letter said GTS had conferred with the plaintiffs and HC Technologies and understood that neither objected to the request.
Disposition
The provided text ends with GTS’s request that the court grant the sealing motion. It does not include an order granting, denying, or otherwise resolving that request. No ruling by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan is shown in the provided text.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.