Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2024

Reid v. Retro Snacks, Inc.

Judge
Garnett
Docket
1:24-cv-04473
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Reid v. Retro Snacks, Judge Garnett ordered settlement discussions and a joint status letter, without deciding standing or the merits.

Who this affects

Nadरेca Reid, Retro Snacks, Inc., and their counsel or parties who had not yet appeared were affected by the required settlement discussions, joint letter, and notice procedures.

What happened

In Reid v. Retro Snacks, Inc., the court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint, making a good-faith effort to settle the case. They were told to discuss whether Reid had satisfied the threshold requirement of standing.

If the parties could not settle, they had to discuss whether court-annexed mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be productive. Within 45 days after service, they must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled and, if not, requesting mediation, a magistrate-judge settlement conference, or an initial status conference.

Judge Margaret M. Garnett also directed appearing counsel to serve the order and the court’s individual rules on counsel who had not appeared, or on the party personally if counsel’s identity was unknown. The order did not decide standing, the merits, or any class-related issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Reid v. Retro Snacks, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-04473
Judge
Garnett
Date
June 13, 2024

Order and required steps

The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint on Retro Snacks, Inc. The meeting must be a good-faith attempt to settle the action. During those discussions, the parties should consider whether Nadreca Reid satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning the legal requirement that a plaintiff be entitled to bring the case in federal court.

If the parties could not settle on their own, they also had to discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the district court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at that time.

Joint letter and notice requirements

Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must file a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, while indicating which option the parties preferred, or an initial status conference.

Counsel who had entered an appearance when the order was issued must promptly notify counsel for other parties who had not appeared by serving them with the order and the court’s Individual Rules and Practices. Counsel must file proof of that notice. If counsel did not know the identity of another party’s counsel, the order required counsel to send the materials directly to that party.

Disposition and scope

This was a case-management and settlement order. The court did not decide whether Reid had standing, whether the claims were legally valid, or whether the proposed class should be certified. The opinion does not state that the case was dismissed, resolved, or decided on the merits.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.