Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 13, 2024

Toro v. The Wasteland Gaming, LLC

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-10585
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Toro v. The Wasteland Gaming: Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Luis Toro, The Wasteland Gaming, LLC, and the other people Luis Toro sought to represent in the action were affected by the order discontinuing the case and closing the docket.

What happened

Toro v. The Wasteland Gaming, LLC was brought by Luis Toro on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The court was told that the case had been settled.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party. It allowed either party to ask to restore the action to the court’s docket within 30 days, while a later application could be denied solely because it was late.

Judge Abrams also directed that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce the settlement must place the settlement terms on the public record and obtain the court’s approval within 30 days. The Clerk was directed to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toro v. The Wasteland Gaming, LLC · No. 1:22-cv-10585
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
June 13, 2024

Background

The opinion states that the Court was informed that the case had been settled. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement terms.

Ruling

The Court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s docket if an application to restore it is made within 30 days. It stated that an application to reopen filed after that period may be denied solely because it was late.

The Court further stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, the settlement terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the Court within the same 30-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Effect

The order ended the case on the Court’s docket based on the reported settlement, while preserving a limited 30-day opportunity to seek restoration. It does not state whether the settlement was approved or describe its effect on Luis Toro or other similarly situated people.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.