NCR Voyix Corporation v. Embarcadero Technologies Europe Limited
- John Koeltl
- 1:24-cv-04458
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In NCR Voyix v. Embarcadero Technologies Europe, Judge Koeltl granted NCR’s application to seal a settlement agreement.
NCR Voyix Corporation and Embarcadero Technologies Europe Limited, as well as members of the public seeking access to the settlement agreement and the specified financial information.
What happened
NCR Voyix Corporation sued Embarcadero Technologies Europe Limited for allegedly breaching a settlement agreement. NCR said Embarcadero had threatened to deactivate software access that the agreement required it to keep available.
NCR asked to file the entire March 31, 2023, settlement agreement under seal. Alternatively, it asked to redact the payment amount, Embarcadero’s bank-account number, and pricing information for new software licenses.
Judge John G. Koeltl granted NCR’s application. The opinion text does not separately explain whether the ruling covered the entire agreement, the proposed redactions, or both.
The detailed version
- NCR Voyix Corporation v. Embarcadero Technologies Europe Limited · No. 1:24-cv-04458
- John Koeltl
- June 13, 2024
Background
NCR filed an action alleging that Embarcadero breached a March 31, 2023, settlement agreement. According to NCR’s filing, the agreement required Embarcadero to allow NCR continued access to software that NCR had licensed from Embarcadero. NCR said Embarcadero had threatened to deactivate that access and that NCR was preparing an emergency request for a temporary restraining order.
Sealing request
NCR asked for permission to file the settlement agreement under seal, meaning outside the public record. As an alternative, NCR asked to redact three categories of information: the amount NCR paid Embarcadero for releases, Embarcadero’s bank-account number, and pricing data for new licenses. NCR relied on the agreement’s confidentiality provision and argued that the financial information was not publicly available. NCR had filed a copy with proposed redactions highlighted and had not yet conferred with Embarcadero because it was preparing the emergency request.
Ruling
The court marked the application “GRANTED” and “SO ORDERED.” Judge John G. Koeltl’s order, as presented in the opinion text, does not separately state whether the ruling authorized sealing the entire settlement agreement, the proposed redactions, or both. The text does not decide NCR’s underlying breach claim or its requested temporary restraining order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.