Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 17, 2024

Morgan v. OneHope, Inc.

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:24-cv-00759
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Judge Vyskocil discontinued Morgan v. OneHope after settlement in principle, allowing restoration by July 29, 2024, before dismissal becomes with prejudice.

Who this affects

Paradise Morgan, OneHope, Inc., and the class of similarly situated persons identified in the complaint.

What happened

In Morgan v. OneHope, Inc., Paradise Morgan sued OneHope, Inc. individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated people. The court said the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application to restore it was filed by July 29, 2024. If no application was filed by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order on June 17, 2024. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Morgan v. OneHope, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-00759
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
June 17, 2024

Background

Paradise Morgan brought the action individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons against OneHope, Inc. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims. OneHope informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar. Restoration was permitted if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and an application to restore the action was made by July 29, 2024. If no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice. The order did not reach the merits of the underlying claims.

Effect

The case was closed subject to the stated restoration condition. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order in the Southern District of New York on June 17, 2024.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.