Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 17, 2024

Finkelstein v. Fox

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:24-cv-04056
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
SecuritiesClass ActionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Finkelstein v. Fox, Judge Furman set deadlines and a conference for lead-plaintiff and lead-counsel motions in a securities class action.

Who this affects

David Finkelstein, the proposed class members, Andrew Fox and the other defendants, and the attorneys involved in seeking appointment as lead plaintiff or lead counsel.

What happened

In Finkelstein v. Fox, David Finkelstein sued Andrew Fox and others on behalf of people who purchased Charge Enterprises, Inc. securities between December 15, 2023, and February 28, 2024. The complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws.

The court said notice of the lawsuit was published on June 11, 2024. Members of the proposed class may move to become lead plaintiff by August 12, 2024; opposition is due August 26, 2024. The court also set a September 5 conference to consider motions concerning the lead plaintiff, lead counsel, and combining related cases.

Judge Jesse M. Furman ordered these case-management steps, required service of the order on the defendants, and required plaintiff’s counsel to report within one week if an amended complaint or related case is filed. The order did not decide whether the securities claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Finkelstein v. Fox · No. 1:24-cv-04056
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
June 17, 2024

Background

David Finkelstein filed a proposed class action on May 28, 2024, individually and on behalf of people who purchased Charge Enterprises, Inc. securities between December 15, 2023, and February 28, 2024. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. The defendants are Andrew Fox and others.

Notice and Lead- Plaintiff Process

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act requires publication of notice advising members of the proposed class about the case, the claims, and the proposed class period. The plaintiff’s counsel notified the court that the required notice was published on June 11, 2024. Under the statutory process described in the order, members of the proposed class may ask to serve as lead plaintiff—the person appointed to represent the class—by August 12, 2024.

Opposition to a motion for appointment of lead plaintiff must be served and filed by August 26, 2024. The court also scheduled a conference for September 5, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse to consider motions for appointment of lead plaintiff and lead counsel, as well as any motion to consolidate related actions.

Additional Orders and Disposition

If an amended complaint or related case is filed before a lead plaintiff is appointed, plaintiff’s counsel must, within one week, identify differences between the new allegations and the original complaint. That report must address differences in the claims and class periods and explain why the court should not require republication of notice and set a new deadline for lead-plaintiff motions. The named plaintiffs must promptly serve a copy of the order on each defendant.

Judge Jesse M. Furman entered these scheduling and case-management orders. The order did not resolve the merits of the securities claims, appoint a lead plaintiff or lead counsel, consolidate any cases, or state whether the proposed class would be certified.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.