Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled June 18, 2024

Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Vernon Broderick
Docket
1:23-cv-05806
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ramirez v. Commissioner, Judge Broderick adopted a recommendation remanding Ramirez’s disability-benefits case to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

Who this affects

Jesenia Ramirez and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

What happened

In Jesenia Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security, Ramirez asked the federal court to review the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The court had referred the case to Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses, and Ramirez filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Judge Moses recommended remanding the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Neither side objected to that recommendation. Judge Broderick reviewed it for clear error and found none.

Judge Vernon S. Broderick adopted the recommendation in full. He directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment consistent with the order, end any open motions, and close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ramirez v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:23-cv-05806
Judge
Vernon Broderick
Date
June 18, 2024

Background

Jesenia Ramirez sought judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses. Ramirez then filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, meaning a request for judgment based on the parties’ written submissions. The Commissioner opposed the motion, and Ramirez filed a reply.

Report and Recommendation

Judge Moses issued a Report and Recommendation on May 31, 2024, recommending that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The parties had 14 days to file objections, but neither party objected or requested more time.

Ruling

Because there were no objections, Judge Vernon S. Broderick reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. He found no clear error and adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate any open motions, enter judgment in accordance with the order, and close the case. The order does not describe the specific issues that led Judge Moses to recommend remand.

Disposition

The action was remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.