Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 20, 2024

Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:23-cv-08311
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Judge Liman granted the parties’ joint motion, cancelled the conference, and said the proposed consent decree would be entered.

Who this affects

The parties to Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc., and the people covered by the proposed consent decree, although the order does not state the decree’s terms.

What happened

In Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc., the parties jointly asked the court to cancel a conference scheduled for June 20, 2024, because they had submitted a revised proposed consent decree.

The court said the revised proposal appeared to satisfy the standards for judicial approval of a consent decree. It granted the motion and cancelled the conference.

Judge Liman stated that the court would enter the proposed consent decree, with a written opinion to follow, and directed the clerk to close the motion docket entry.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cruz v. JKS Ventures, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-08311
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
June 20, 2024

Background The parties jointly moved under Docket No. 27 to cancel a court conference scheduled for June 20, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. They explained that they had submitted a revised proposed consent decree, which is a court-approved agreement resolving a dispute.

Court’s Analysis The court stated that the revised proposed consent decree appeared to meet the standards for judicial approval described in U.S.S.E.C. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., 752 F.3d 285, 294–95 (2d Cir. 2014). The order does not describe the decree’s terms or decide the underlying claims.

Ruling Judge Lewis J. Liman granted the parties’ joint motion and cancelled the scheduled conference. The court stated that it would enter the proposed consent decree, with an opinion to follow. The clerk was directed to close Docket No. 27.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.