Karim v. BuyMeBeauty, Inc.
- Garnett
- 1:24-cv-04785
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Karim v. BuyMeBeauty, Judge Garnett ordered settlement discussions and a joint status letter without deciding the case’s merits.
Jessica Karim, BuyMeBeauty, Inc., and counsel who have appeared or later appear in the action.
What happened
Karim v. BuyMeBeauty, Inc. is an order directing the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the defendant is served with the summons and complaint. They must make a good-faith effort to settle and discuss whether the plaintiff has met the threshold requirement of standing.
If the case does not settle, the parties must discuss whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge would be useful. Within 15 more days, they must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled, requesting mediation or an initial status conference if they did not, and stating whether BuyMeBeauty intends to answer or seek dismissal.
Judge Margaret M. Garnett stayed BuyMeBeauty’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond until the joint letter is filed. The order does not decide standing, dismissal, or any other merits issue.
The detailed version
- Karim v. BuyMeBeauty, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-04785
- Garnett
- June 27, 2024
Order
The court ordered the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint on BuyMeBeauty, Inc. The meeting must be a good-faith attempt to settle the action. The parties were directed to discuss whether Jessica Karim has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning the requirement that a plaintiff be entitled to ask a federal court to decide a dispute. The order cited decisions concerning standing but did not decide whether Karim has standing.
Further Procedures
If the parties cannot settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court’s mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive. Within 15 additional days—45 days after service of the summons and complaint—the parties must file a joint letter telling the court whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either referral to mediation or a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, with a preference between those options, or an initial status conference.
The joint letter must also state whether BuyMeBeauty intends to answer the complaint or move to dismiss it. If BuyMeBeauty intends to move to dismiss, it must briefly state the anticipated basis for that motion in no more than one paragraph. BuyMeBeauty’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is stayed pending the joint letter. After the letter is filed, the court will set either a deadline for the answer or a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss.
Notice to Counsel
Counsel who had appeared by the date of the order must promptly serve the order and Judge Garnett’s Individual Rules and Practices on counsel for parties who had not appeared, or personally on the party if counsel’s identity was unknown. Those counsel must file proof of the notice with the court.
Disposition
Judge Margaret M. Garnett entered case-management and settlement-related directives. The order did not rule on standing, a motion to dismiss, or the merits of the action.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.