Gonzalez v. Great Outdoor Shop, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-07932
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Gonzalez v. Great Outdoor Shop, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, subject to possible restoration by July 27, 2024.
Yanilza Gonzalez, Great Outdoor Shop, LLC, and the action brought on behalf of Gonzalez and all other persons similarly situated.
What happened
In Gonzalez v. Great Outdoor Shop, Yanilza Gonzalez told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not put their settlement in writing. Any request to restore the case had to be made by July 27, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that if no request to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Gonzalez v. Great Outdoor Shop, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-07932
- Vyskocil
- June 27, 2024
Background
Yanilza Gonzalez filed the action on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated against Great Outdoor Shop, LLC. The court received a letter from Gonzalez stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not identify the underlying claims or describe the proposed settlement.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The dismissal was without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s calendar if the parties could not memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action was made by July 27, 2024. The order further states that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Ruling
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order of dismissal on June 27, 2024. This was a procedural disposition based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle; the court did not decide the underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.