Sookul v. Sartoro LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-06297
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Sookul v. Sartoro LLC, Judge Vyskocil dismissed the case after a reported settlement in principle, subject to restoration by July 28, 2024.
Sanjay Sookul and Sartoro LLC; the action was discontinued subject to the stated deadline and settlement conditions.
What happened
Sanjay Sookul told the court that he and Sartoro LLC had reached a settlement in principle in Sookul v. Sartoro LLC.
The court discontinued the case without costs to either party. The case could be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing and an application to restore it was made by July 28, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no restoration application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Sookul v. Sartoro LLC · No. 1:23-cv-06297
- Vyskocil
- June 27, 2024
Background
The court received a letter from Plaintiff Sanjay Sookul stating that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. The order allowed either party to seek restoration of the action to the court’s calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, but the application had to be made by July 28, 2024. The order stated that if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Effect
The opinion does not decide the underlying claims or state whether the settlement was ultimately completed. Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil’s order conditionally ended the case while preserving a time-limited opportunity to restore it.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.