Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2024

Manzella v. Select Rehabilitation LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-00860
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Manzella v. Select Rehabilitation LLC, Judge Caproni canceled a conference and ordered plaintiffs to re-file a voluntary-dismissal stipulation by June 28.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and their counsel must correct and re-file the voluntary-dismissal stipulation by June 28, 2024. The scheduled status conference was canceled, and failure to meet the deadline may result in sanctions.

What happened

In Manzella v. Select Rehabilitation LLC, the plaintiffs told the court they intended to end the case voluntarily and had filed a dismissal stipulation without prejudice. The filing included a required statement about the settlement and future lawsuits, but the Clerk’s Office identified filing problems.

The plaintiffs had not yet filed a corrected stipulation. Because they intended to dismiss their claims without prejudice, the court canceled a June 28 status conference that had been scheduled to address the settlement-related filing requirements.

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the plaintiffs to correct and re-file the stipulation by June 28, 2024. The order warned that failing to meet the deadline could result in sanctions; it did not itself dismiss the claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Manzella v. Select Rehabilitation LLC · No. 1:23-cv-00860
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
June 27, 2024

Background

Adrianna Manzella and Michele Dzula brought the case individually and on behalf of similarly situated people against Select Rehabilitation LLC, Select PT, OT & SLP Rehabilitation New York PLLC, Anna Gardina Wolfe, and Michael Capstick. The court had scheduled a June 28, 2024 status conference if the parties did not submit a filing addressing requirements related to their settlement.

The court’s earlier order allowed the plaintiffs to file a voluntary-dismissal stipulation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) if it included an affirmation stating that the plaintiffs had been clearly advised that the settlement would not prevent them from filing another lawsuit against the same defendants and that the settlement agreement did not release the defendants. On June 24, the plaintiffs filed a stipulation of voluntary dismissal without prejudice containing the required affirmation. On June 25, the Clerk’s Office told plaintiffs’ counsel that the filing had deficiencies and instructed counsel to re-file it properly. The plaintiffs had not re-filed it by June 27.

Ruling

Judge Valerie Caproni ordered that the June 28 status conference be canceled because the plaintiffs intended to dismiss their claims without prejudice. She further ordered the plaintiffs to correct the deficiencies identified by the Clerk’s Office and re-file the voluntary-dismissal stipulation by Friday, June 28, 2024. The order stated that failure to meet the deadline could result in sanctions. The opinion does not state that the court itself entered the dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.