Competello v. Under 5'10 LLC
- Garnett
- 1:24-cv-04905
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Competello v. Under 5'10 LLC, Judge Garnett ordered settlement talks and a joint status letter while staying Defendant’s response deadline.
Susan Competello and Under 5'10 LLC, whose settlement discussions, joint-letter deadline, and response schedule were governed by the order; appearing counsel also had service and notice obligations.
What happened
In Competello v. Under 5'10 LLC, the court ordered Susan Competello and Under 5'10 LLC to meet for at least one hour and try in good faith to settle the case. They were told to discuss whether Competello had met the legal requirement of standing.
If the parties did not settle, they had to file a joint letter stating whether they wanted mediation, a settlement conference with a magistrate judge, or an initial status conference. The letter also had to state whether Under 5'10 LLC planned to answer the complaint or ask the court to dismiss it.
Judge Margaret M. Garnett stayed Under 5'10 LLC’s deadline to answer or otherwise respond until the joint letter was filed. The order did not decide standing or the merits of the case.
The detailed version
- Competello v. Under 5'10 LLC · No. 1:24-cv-04905
- Garnett
- July 1, 2024
What the court ordered
The court directed the parties to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The meeting had to be a good-faith attempt to settle the action. The parties were also directed to discuss whether Susan Competello had satisfied the threshold requirement of standing, meaning whether she had the legal basis required to bring the case in federal court. The order cited two Second Circuit decisions concerning standing.
If the parties could not settle, they had to submit a joint letter within 15 additional days, or within 45 days after service of the summons and complaint. The letter had to state whether the case had settled. If it had not, the parties had to ask the court either to refer the case to mediation or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, while stating their preference, or to proceed with an initial status conference.
The joint letter also had to state whether Under 5'10 LLC intended to answer the complaint or move to dismiss it. If it intended to move to dismiss, the letter had to briefly describe the anticipated basis for that motion in no more than one paragraph.
Effect on the case
The deadline for Under 5'10 LLC to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint was stayed until the parties submitted the joint letter. After receiving the letter, the court would set either a deadline for the answer or a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss. The order did not rule on standing, any motion to dismiss, or the merits of the underlying dispute. It also directed appearing counsel to serve the order and the judge’s individual rules on counsel or parties who had not appeared and to file proof of that notice.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.