Button v. Doherty
- John Cronan
- 1:24-cv-05026
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Button v. Doherty, Judge Swain ordered the plaintiffs to pay fees or submit applications to proceed without prepayment.
Dusty Button and Mitchell Taylor Button must either pay the $405 fee or submit separate signed applications to proceed without prepayment if both seek that option. Failure to comply may result in dismissal without prejudice to refiling.
What happened
Button v. Doherty was submitted to the Southern District of New York by email and assigned docket number 24-CV-5026. The plaintiffs are Dusty Button and Mitchell Taylor Button; the defendants include Juliet Doherty.
The court ordered the plaintiffs, within 30 days, to either pay $405 in fees or submit signed applications to proceed without paying the fees in advance. If both plaintiffs seek that option, each must submit a separate application.
No further action will be taken, and no summons or answer will be required, until payment or a completed application is received. If the plaintiffs do not comply or request more time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.
The detailed version
- Button v. Doherty · No. 1:24-cv-05026
- John Cronan
- July 3, 2024
Background
Dusty Button and Mitchell Taylor Button submitted this civil action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by email. The case was assigned docket number 24-CV-5026. Juliet Doherty and other defendants are listed in the caption.
Order
The court explained that a plaintiff starting a civil action must either pay the required fees or request permission to proceed without prepaying them by submitting a signed application. The required payment was $405, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee.
The court gave the plaintiffs 30 days from the date of the order to pay the fees or submit completed and signed applications to proceed without prepayment. If both plaintiffs seek that status, each must submit a separate application. The order provided instructions for paying by mail or in person.
Until the fees are paid or a completed and signed application is received, the court will take no further action, and no summons will issue or answer will be required. If the plaintiffs comply, the Clerk’s Office will process the case. If the court grants an application, the plaintiffs may proceed without prepaying the fees.
Disposition
The court did not decide the underlying claims. It ordered payment of the fees or submission of the required applications. It stated that if the plaintiffs fail to comply within the allowed time, or fail to request an extension, the action will be dismissed without prejudice to refiling. The court also certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.