Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 3, 2024

Tucker v. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:24-cv-05051
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Tucker v. Ryman Hospitality, Judge Rochon ordered the parties to discuss settlement, consider standing, and report whether they settled.

Who this affects

Henry Tucker, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., and the court, which will receive the parties’ joint report and any request for mediation, a settlement conference, or an initial status conference.

What happened

Tucker v. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is an order in Henry Tucker’s proposed group action against Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. The court did not decide the claims or whether Tucker has standing to sue.

The parties must meet for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint, or within 30 days after waiver of service. They must make a good-faith effort to settle and consider whether Tucker satisfies the requirement of having a sufficient connection to bring the case.

Within 15 additional days, the parties must jointly tell the court whether they settled. If not, they must ask for mediation or a settlement conference with a magistrate judge, or request an initial status conference. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order on July 3, 2024.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tucker v. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-05051
Judge
Rochon
Date
July 3, 2024

Order

The court ordered Henry Tucker and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. to meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle the action. The meeting must occur within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint, or, alternatively, within 30 days after waiver of service.

The parties must consider whether Tucker has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing—the requirement that a person have a sufficient legal basis to bring a lawsuit. The order cites Second Circuit decisions addressing standing, but it does not decide whether Tucker has standing.

Further Report to the Court

Within 15 additional days, or within 45 days after service or waiver of service, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the joint letter must request either referral to the district court’s mediation program or to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, with a preference stated between those options, or an initial status conference.

Disposition

This is a procedural settlement-management order. It does not resolve the merits of Tucker’s claims, decide class certification, or determine standing.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.