Holley v. Spartan Auto Group, LLC
- Tarnofsky
- 1:24-cv-00844
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Holley v. Spartan Auto Group, Judge Tarnofsky discontinued the settled action without costs, allowing restoration by August 3, 2024.
Jasmine Holley and the defendants, including Spartan Auto Group, LLC; the action was discontinued based on the parties’ reported settlement in principle.
What happened
In Holley v. Spartan Auto Group, LLC, the court was informed that Jasmine Holley and the defendants had reached a settlement in principle.
The opinion does not describe the claims or the settlement’s terms. It states that the parties still needed to put their settlement in writing.
Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if the parties could not complete the written settlement and applied to restore the case by August 3, 2024. If no application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Holley v. Spartan Auto Group, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-00844
- Tarnofsky
- July 3, 2024
Background
The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not state the claims in the case or the terms of the proposed settlement.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party. It also ordered that the action could be restored to the court’s calendar without prejudice if the parties were unable to memorialize, or put into writing, their settlement and applied for restoration by August 3, 2024.
If no application to restore the action was made by August 3, 2024, the court stated that the dismissal would be with prejudice. The opinion does not decide the merits of the parties’ underlying dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.