Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 8, 2024

Barkley v. Otisville Correctional Facility

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:24-cv-05017
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Barkley v. Otisville Correctional Facility, Judge Swain ordered a signed complaint within 30 days or dismissal.

Who this affects

Peter J. Barkley, who must provide an original signature on the complaint’s signature page within 30 days or the action will be dismissed.

What happened

In Barkley v. Otisville Correctional Facility, Peter J. Barkley filed a complaint without a lawyer, but did not sign it.

The court ordered Barkley to submit the complaint’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days. The court said no summons would issue for now and that the case would proceed through the Clerk’s Office if he complied; otherwise, the action would be dismissed.

Judge Swain also denied fee-free appeal status, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Barkley v. Otisville Correctional Facility · No. 7:24-cv-05017
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
July 8, 2024

Background

Peter J. Barkley brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted a complaint that did not contain a signature.

Court’s order

The court explained that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) and Local Civil Rule 11.1(a) require an unrepresented party to sign a pleading personally. The court directed Barkley to submit the complaint’s signature page with an original signature within 30 days of the order. A copy of the signature page was attached.

The court ordered that no summons issue at that time. If Barkley complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he did not comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal ruling and classification

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free appeal status for purposes of an appeal. The order addressed the complaint’s missing signature and did not reach the underlying claims. It is therefore a procedural order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.