Lent v. Prezzee, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:23-cv-07098
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Lent v. Prezzee, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the action after a settlement in principle, allowing restoration until August 9, 2024; otherwise, dismissal became with prejudice.
Eric Lent and Prezzee, Inc., the parties to the action.
What happened
In Lent v. Prezzee, Plaintiff Eric Lent told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to either party and allowed it to be restored if the parties could not put their settlement in writing, provided an application was made by August 9, 2024.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered that, if no application to restore the action was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Lent v. Prezzee, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-07098
- Vyskocil
- July 10, 2024
Background
Plaintiff Eric Lent filed a letter informing the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement's terms.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court's calendar if the parties were unable to memorialize their settlement in writing. Any application to restore the action had to be made by August 9, 2024. The court further ordered that, if no such application was made by that date, the dismissal would be with prejudice.
Judge
United States District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil issued the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.