Norris v. Sadlerstone, LLC
- John Cronan
- 1:24-cv-03011
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Norris v. Sadlerstone, Judge Cronan extended Norris’s amended-complaint deadline while leaving Sadlerstone’s answer deadline unchanged.
Norris must file the proposed second amended complaint by August 12, 2024. Sadlerstone, LLC’s September 12, 2024 answer deadline remains unchanged.
What happened
In Norris v. Sadlerstone, the court said that Norris had not filed the proposed second amended complaint by the August 1, 2024 deadline previously ordered by the court.
The court extended the filing deadline to August 12, 2024. It did not change Sadlerstone, LLC’s September 12, 2024 deadline to answer.
Judge John P. Cronan warned that failing to follow court orders could lead to sanctions. The order did not decide the underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Norris v. Sadlerstone, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-03011
- John Cronan
- Aug. 5, 2024
Background
On July 29, 2024, the Court ordered Norris to file a proposed second amended complaint by August 1, 2024. The docket did not show that Norris had filed the pleading by that deadline.
Order
The Court extended the deadline for Norris to file the proposed second amended complaint to August 12, 2024. It left Sadlerstone, LLC’s September 12, 2024 deadline to answer unchanged.
The Court reminded Norris that litigants must comply with court orders and stated that failing to do so may result in sanctions. This order addressed filing deadlines and compliance; it did not resolve the parties’ underlying claims.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.