Button v. The New York Times Company
- Laura Swain
- 1:24-cv-05888
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Button v. The New York Times Company, Judge Swain ordered payment or fee-waiver applications before the case could proceed.
Dusty Button and Mitchell Taylor Button, who must pay the required fees or each submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying them for the case to move forward.
What happened
In Button v. The New York Times Company, the plaintiffs submitted the action by email. The court told them they must either pay $405 in fees or each submit a signed application to proceed without paying the fees upfront.
The plaintiffs had 30 days from the order to comply. Until they did, the court would take no further action, issue no summons, and require no answer from the defendants. If the court approved their applications, they could proceed without paying the fees upfront.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if the plaintiffs did not comply or requested more time. She also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for any appeal from the order.
The detailed version
- Button v. The New York Times Company · No. 1:24-cv-05888
- Laura Swain
- Aug. 6, 2024
Background
Dusty Button and Mitchell Taylor Button submitted this civil action to the Southern District of New York by email. The court assigned docket number 24-CV-5888. The opinion does not address the underlying claims against The New York Times Company or the other defendants.
Order
The court explained that a plaintiff starting a civil action must either pay the required fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying them. It ordered each plaintiff, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the total $405 fee or complete, sign, and submit an application to proceed without prepayment of fees. The opinion states that the $405 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $55 administrative fee, subject to possible updates to the fee schedule.
No further action would be taken, no summons would issue, and no answer would be required until the payment or completed applications were received. If the court granted the applications, the plaintiffs would be allowed to proceed without prepaying the fees.
Disposition
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered that the action would be dismissed without prejudice to refiling if the plaintiffs failed to comply within the allowed time or sought an extension. The court also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. This order was procedural and did not decide the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.