Albritton v. Fredella
- Subramanian
- 1:22-cv-04512
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Albritton v. Fredella, Judge Subramanian granted Albritton’s request to seal exhibits supporting his request to file an amended complaint.
Jemal Albritton’s request to seal exhibits was granted; the defendants did not oppose it.
What happened
In Albritton v. Fredella, Jemal Albritton asked the court to seal certain exhibits attached to his request to file an amended complaint.
The defendants did not oppose the request, even though the court invited them to do so. The court reviewed the documents and applied the required three-part test for sealing court records.
Judge Arun Subramanian granted Albritton’s request and directed the clerk to close the motion on the court’s docket.
The detailed version
- Albritton v. Fredella · No. 1:22-cv-04512
- Subramanian
- Aug. 6, 2024
Background
On September 6, 2023, Jemal Albritton asked the court to seal certain exhibits attached to his request to file an amended complaint. The opinion does not identify the contents of the exhibits.
The Request
The defendants did not oppose the request, despite the court’s invitation to do so. The court reviewed the documents and applied the three-part test described in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006).
Ruling
Judge Arun Subramanian granted Albritton’s request to seal the exhibits. The clerk was directed to terminate docket entry 61, which was the sealing motion.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.