Silva v. Consolidated Scaffolding, Inc.
- Lorna Schofield
- 1:24-cv-04591
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Silva v. Consolidated Scaffolding, Judge Schofield ordered responses and discussions before deciding conditional collective certification.
Wilber David Silva, Consolidated Scaffolding, Inc., the other defendants, and workers who might potentially join the proposed Fair Labor Standards Act collective.
What happened
Wilber David Silva brought this Fair Labor Standards Act case on behalf of a proposed group of workers. He told the court that he intended to seek conditional certification of that group.
The court ordered the defendants to respond to Silva’s letter by August 12, 2024. It also directed the parties to discuss whether they could agree to conditional certification and the notice sent to potential participants, while preserving the defendants’ right to challenge final certification later.
Judge Lorna G. Schofield said Silva’s proposed motion would be addressed at the initial pretrial conference on August 21, 2024. The order did not grant or deny conditional certification.
The detailed version
- Silva v. Consolidated Scaffolding, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-04591
- Lorna Schofield
- Aug. 6, 2024
Background
Wilber David Silva brought this action on behalf of a proposed collective under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Silva filed a letter stating that he intended to move for conditional certification of the collective. Conditional certification is the preliminary step for notifying potentially eligible workers that they may join the case.
Court’s analysis
The court stated that the first-step standard for conditional certification is lenient. At that stage, plaintiffs need only make a modest factual showing that they and potential participants were affected by a common policy or plan that violated the law. The court also noted that a more demanding standard applies at the later final-certification stage.
Order
The court ordered the defendants to respond to Silva’s letter, as required by the court’s Individual Rules, by August 12, 2024. The parties were also directed to meet and confer before the initial pretrial conference about possibly agreeing to conditional certification and the form of notice. The order preserved the defendants’ rights to object to final certification under the more rigorous later-stage standard.
The court stated that Silva’s proposed motion for conditional certification would be addressed at the initial pretrial conference scheduled for August 21, 2024, at 4:20 p.m. The order did not grant or deny the proposed motion.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.