New York Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. CSC Hudson, LLC
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:24-cv-05025
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In New York Hotel and Gaming Trades Council v. CSC Hudson, Judge Engelmayer set deadlines for briefing a petition to confirm an arbitral award.
The New York Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, AFL-CIO, CSC Hudson, LLC, and the other respondents in the petition to confirm the arbitral award.
What happened
New York Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, AFL-CIO filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitral award against CSC Hudson, LLC and other respondents.
The petitioner filed the petition and supporting documents on July 2, 2024, and later filed affidavits stating that the respondents had been served.
Judge Engelmayer ordered the petitioner to file and serve its supporting memorandum and any additional materials by August 28, 2024. Any opposition was due September 11, and any reply was due September 18. The order did not decide whether to confirm the award.
The detailed version
- New York Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, AFL-CIO v. CSC Hudson, LLC · No. 1:24-cv-05025
- Paul Engelmayer
- Aug. 7, 2024
Background
On July 2, 2024, the New York Hotel and Gaming Trades Council, AFL-CIO filed a petition to confirm an arbitral award, along with supporting exhibits. The petitioner later filed affidavits of service stating that the petition and supporting materials had been served on the respondents.
Court’s Order
The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitral award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer ordered the petitioner to file and serve a memorandum of law supporting the petition, along with any additional supporting materials, by August 28, 2024. Any opposition from the respondents was due September 11, 2024, and any reply from the petitioner was due September 18, 2024.
This order set the briefing schedule. The opinion did not decide whether the arbitral award should be confirmed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.