Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 9, 2024

Nike, Inc. v. Stockx LLC

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-00983
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Nike v. StockX, Judge Caproni granted the parties’ request to initially seal summary-judgment materials containing confidential information.

Who this affects

Nike, Inc. and StockX LLC, whose summary-judgment materials may be filed initially under seal and later submitted with proposed redactions under the court’s filing rules.

What happened

Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC concerns the parties’ joint request to keep their summary-judgment filings sealed at first. Judge Caproni approved the request.

The parties said the filings would cite confidential material covered by their protective order, including discovery documents, expert reports, and deposition transcripts. They requested time to exchange proposed redactions and file public versions where appropriate.

Judge Valerie Caproni granted the application and directed the parties to follow her individual rules when filing sealed or redacted materials. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nike, Inc. v. Stockx LLC · No. 1:22-cv-00983
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Aug. 9, 2024

Background

Nike, Inc. and StockX LLC jointly asked the court to allow sealed treatment of their summary-judgment briefing, including moving briefs, oppositions, replies, declarations, and exhibits. They said those materials would rely on information designated confidential under the parties’ stipulated protective order, including documents produced in discovery, expert reports, and fact and expert deposition transcripts.

Requested Filing Process

The parties proposed filing the summary-judgment materials under seal initially. They also proposed exchanging proposed redactions, filing final proposed redactions under seal, and filing public letter motions explaining why sealing was justified. The letter includes an apparent date inconsistency: it refers to October 17, 2024, and then gives October 24, 2023, as a later filing date. The opinion does not clarify that discrepancy.

Ruling

Judge Valerie Caproni granted the application. She directed the parties to comply with her individual rules when filing materials under seal or filing materials containing redactions. The order addressed the handling of the filings and did not rule on the merits of Nike’s or StockX’s claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.