Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Gregory Woods
- 1:24-cv-05667
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Strike 3 Holdings v. Doe, Judge Woods granted early discovery so Strike 3 could subpoena Verizon for the Doe subscriber’s name and address.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the identity and address of the subscriber assigned IP address 108.54.228.49. Verizon Online LLC must follow the order’s identification and notice procedures, and the subscriber may object to the subpoena within the stated period. The order also restricts disclosure of the information.
What happened
In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, Strike 3 asked for permission to serve Verizon Online LLC, also called Verizon Fios, with a subpoena before the parties held the usual discovery conference. The subpoena seeks the name and address of the subscriber assigned IP address 108.54.228.49.
The court applied a flexible reasonableness-and-good-cause standard, with especially careful review because Strike 3 sought discovery before the conference and without advance notice to the other side. The court said this order does not decide the merits of any future request to cancel or block the subpoena.
Judge Gregory H. Woods granted Strike 3’s motion. Verizon must try to identify and notify the subscriber, and both Verizon and the subscriber have specified periods to object. Unless there is an objection, Verizon must provide the requested information, which Strike 3 may use only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint; the information may not be disclosed further without the court’s permission.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe · No. 1:24-cv-05667
- Gregory Woods
- Aug. 16, 2024
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve a third-party subpoena on Verizon Online LLC, identified in the order as Verizon Fios, before the parties’ required conference about discovery. The subpoena seeks the name and address of the subscriber assigned Internet Protocol address 108.54.228.49. The defendant is captioned as John Doe, subscriber assigned that address.
Court’s analysis
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(d) generally bars a party from seeking discovery before the parties confer as required by Rule 26(f), unless a court authorizes earlier discovery. The court applied a flexible reasonableness-and-good-cause standard and stated that it would scrutinize the request especially carefully because Strike 3 sought both expedited discovery and an order without advance notice to the opposing side.
The court noted that Strike 3 relied on a test concerning requests to cancel subpoenas in order to preserve an objecting party’s anonymity. The court emphasized that anonymity and any future request to cancel the subpoena were not before it. The order therefore was not a decision on the merits of any potential motion to quash, meaning a motion asking the court to cancel or limit the subpoena.
Ruling and procedures
The court found that Strike 3 met the reasonableness-and-good-cause standard, even under the heightened review for a request without advance notice, and granted Strike 3’s motion for permission to serve the subpoena before the Rule 26(f) conference.
The order permits Strike 3 to serve Verizon with a subpoena under Rule 45 and requires counsel to attach the order. Within seven days after service, Verizon must reasonably try to identify the subscriber and give the subscriber a copy of the subpoena and order. If Verizon cannot identify the subscriber with a reasonable degree of technical certainty, it must notify Strike 3’s counsel.
Verizon has 21 days after service to move to cancel or otherwise object to the subpoena. The identified subscriber has 14 days after receiving the subpoena from Verizon to do the same. If no motion or objection is filed, Verizon must provide the requested information within 21 days after notifying the subscriber. Strike 3 may use the information only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint, and no one other than Strike 3 and its counsel may receive the information without further court permission. Judge Gregory H. Woods also directed the Clerk to terminate the motion listed at docket number 9.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.