Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 19, 2024

AlSariaa v. Tempositions, Inc.

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:24-cv-02451
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In AlSariaa v. Tempositions, Inc., Judge Ramos ordered service of the operative pleadings through the Marshals Service in the pro se plaintiff’s discrimination case.

Who this affects

Noora Dhafir Alsariaa, TemPositions Inc. School Professionals, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In AlSariaa v. Tempositions, Inc., Noora Dhafir Alsariaa alleges that her employer discriminated against her because of her national origin. The court also understood her filings to raise claims under federal, New York State, and New York City civil-rights laws.

Because Alsariaa was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees in advance, the court said the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service would handle service. The court treated her complaint and amended complaint together as the operative pleading and extended the service period until 90 days after summonses are issued.

Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the Clerk to issue summonses, complete the service form, and send the necessary papers to the Marshals Service for service on TemPositions Inc. School Professionals. The order did not decide whether the discrimination claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
AlSariaa v. Tempositions, Inc. · No. 1:24-cv-02451
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Aug. 19, 2024

Background

Noora Dhafir Alsariaa is proceeding without a lawyer and alleges that her employer discriminated against her based on her national origin under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court also construed her complaint as asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law.

The court had previously allowed Alsariaa to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because both the complaint and amended complaint contained facts supporting her claims, the court treated both documents as the operative pleading in the action.

Service ruling

The court explained that a plaintiff who is allowed to proceed without prepaying fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. It directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses, complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for TemPositions Inc. School Professionals, and deliver the summonses and the complaint materials to the Marshals Service.

The court extended the time for service until 90 days after any summonses issue. It stated that if service is not completed within that period, Alsariaa should request an extension. The Clerk was also directed to mail Alsariaa an information package. The order warned that she must notify the court in writing if her address changes and that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so.

Disposition and scope

Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered service of the operative pleadings. The opinion is an administrative and procedural order concerning service; it does not decide the merits of Alsariaa’s discrimination claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.