Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc.
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:22-cv-04069
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Minden Pictures v. Complex Media, Judge Abrams denied Complex Media’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend, after a Second Circuit ruling rejected its key theories.
Minden Pictures, Inc. and Complex Media, Inc.; the order also directed the parties to take specified procedural steps in the litigation.
What happened
Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc. involved Complex Media’s motion to dismiss Minden Pictures’ second amended complaint. The court had paused the motion while an appeal in a related copyright case was pending.
After the Second Circuit held that there is no exception for sophisticated plaintiffs to the rule governing when claims are discovered, the court denied Complex Media’s motion to dismiss, with leave to amend. The court also directed the parties to report on the next steps, including whether Complex Media would file another motion to dismiss.
Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the stay lifted and directed the Clerk of Court to close the pending motion. The order did not resolve the parties’ underlying copyright dispute.
The detailed version
- Minden Pictures, Inc. v. Complex Media, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-04069
- Ronnie Abrams
- Aug. 19, 2024
Background
On November 28, 2023, the court stayed Complex Media’s motion to dismiss Minden Pictures’ second amended complaint. The stay continued while the Second Circuit considered an appeal in a related copyright case. On August 16, 2024, the Second Circuit held that there is no “sophisticated plaintiff” exception to the discovery rule or to a defendant’s burden to plead and prove a statute-of-limitations defense.
Ruling
The court stated that Complex Media’s motion was based largely on arguments that Minden Pictures was a sophisticated litigant that should have known about the alleged copyright breach and that the discovery rule does not apply in copyright cases without fraud. In light of the Second Circuit’s decision, the court denied the pending motion to dismiss, with leave to amend.
Further proceedings
The parties were ordered to file a joint letter by August 30, 2024, addressing the next steps in the litigation. If Complex Media planned to file another motion to dismiss, the parties had to include a proposed briefing schedule. The Clerk of Court was directed to lift the stay and close the motion pending at ECF No. 37.
Classification
This is a procedural order because it ruled on a motion to dismiss, a threshold pleading motion, rather than deciding the underlying copyright dispute on the merits.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.