Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 21, 2024

Theodore v. Town of Kent New York

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:24-cv-05414
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Ryan Theodore v. Town of Kent New York, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Theodore neither paid filing fees nor submitted an IFP application.

Who this affects

Ryan Theodore, whose complaint was dismissed without prejudice after he neither submitted the required application to proceed without paying filing fees nor paid the $405 filing fee.

What happened

Ryan Theodore sued the Town of Kent New York and other defendants in the Southern District of New York. The court had ordered him to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the required $405 filing fee within thirty days.

Theodore did neither. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning he may file it again. The court also directed the clerk to enter judgment.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Theodore permission to appeal without paying fees. The opinion says the dismissal was based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Theodore v. Town of Kent New York · No. 7:24-cv-05414
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Aug. 21, 2024

Background

The court had previously ordered Ryan Theodore to submit a completed application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The order gave him thirty days and warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Court’s Ruling

Theodore did not submit the application and did not pay the filing fee. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, which leaves Theodore free to refile it. The court cited 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915 and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.